Froda

Level of commitment

Before launch planning starts, Froda and the partner should agree on three things: what success looks like, how visible and active the product will be, and who actually runs the day-to-day activation. These three decisions shape everything else in the Launch and Activation playbooks.

Joint targets

The first formal step between Froda and the partner: agree on what success looks like. The Commercial Owner works with Froda to define a shared hypothesis, not a perfect forecast, but a baseline that can later be measured, validated, and improved.

Portfolio size

The size of the customer base the product is being made available to.

Eligible customer base

How many of those customers actually qualify for the product.

Expected conversion

What share of the eligible portfolio is expected to convert.

Expected number of activated customers

How many customers are expected to actually engage with the product.

Expected applications

The volume of applications expected over a given period.

Expected funded customers

How many of those applications are expected to result in a funded loan.

Revenue or other commercial outcomes

Any other commercial KPIs relevant to the partnership.

More on joint targets →

Activation commitment

How visible should the product be, and how much activation is planned? It should define which always-on placements exist, which customer channels are used, and how much launch and ongoing activity is planned. Rather than defining this from scratch, choose from four recommended levels.

Bare Minimum

No budget

The minimum activity required to give the product a reasonable chance of adoption.

Standard

No–low budget

A stronger and more complete launch with multiple channels and recurring activation.

Growth-Oriented

No–low budget

A more ambitious setup designed to actively drive adoption and growth.

Big Boom

Medium–high budget

A high-intensity launch where the partner wants to make the product highly visible across many channels and create significant awareness quickly.

More on the activation commitment →